Re: Bug#1077764: Ruling request on os-release specification implementation
Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMw=ZnQ0mHWqZD+kduFHVePL=6av2=4nREH3AJ=4=PU__GkHbg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 11:37, Helmut Grohne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > that matters. This is not a hard technical problem with no known > > solution that we are asking for design guidance on. This is a trivial > > technical problem with a hard social conflict at its core. What we are > > That's actually great news. Many of us have perceived this as difficult > to solve on a technical level. Would you mind attaching your > implementation to a mail? For instance you may attach your new source > package (possibly multiple times for different suites) as well as > debdiffs for other related packages (if needed). I was assuming that > asking for this was too much prior to making a decision, but as you say > it is trivial, it is much easier to reason about that code than reason > about what we have now. Yes, I do mind, as explained here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077764#388