Bug#1065416: requesting input on recent posts to #1065416

Stefano Rivera <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte
Message-ID <wpju37xscgljr5ccgebyvu4jnjvzoilvgw33oyixtgpcfusnso__10086.7417104141$1723806568$gmane$org@eawksw2lvt3p>
Hi Matthias (2024.07.20_13:01:42_+0200)
> I still don't see this as an issue that the Technical Committee should
> decide.

The Technical Committee is hoping that this will be resolved without
requiring us to make a decision. If the take-over offer resolves the
issue, then we will probably vote to take no further action.

> - I am accepting the offer given in
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065416#108
>   to take over the linux-libc-dev package.
>   I will start working on that at DebCamp and DebConf.

Can you tell us a little more about how you plan to maintain
linux-libc-dev?

Specifically:

Will it be another binary package in cross-toolchain-base, built from
linux-source-*?

Will cross-toolchain-base now contain linux-libc-dev-*-cross and
linux-libc-dev, as separate Arch: all, Multi-Arch: foreign binary
packages?

I don't know much about the stability of these headers, but I see
regular changes. I assume moving linux-libc-dev from the linux source
to cross-toolchain-base will mean that you'll have to do more frequent
uploads of cross-toolchain-base to keep them up to date, where this was
less critical for cross-compiler toolchains.

What are the consequences of not staying up to date? I'm guessing
incoming bug reports from other packages wanting to use new features.

Stefano
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.