Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:12:56 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87msi2d0lz.fsf__23943.7893543922$1731550527$gmane$org@melete.silentflame.com> |
Hello, On Fri 08 Nov 2024 at 02:00pm +01, Helmut Grohne wrote: > In my understanding, system-log-daemon virtual package originally served > two distinct purposes: > > 1. If you depend on it, then you can assume that messages emitted using > syslog(3) or written to /dev/log are handled in some means. > 2. The dependency system prevents two implementations of a /dev/log > handling service from being installed at the same time. > > When I say "exclusion mechanism" I refer to the second purpose. My > understanding of the conversation thus far is that we have broad > consensus for continued use of the virtual package for preventing > coinstallation of two logging services (2) while we have some > disagreement about how to express a requirement on logging services to > be available (1). Thanks, I see what you mean now. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmc1XKgZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQAkZD/4+oPvHYkr+bLSfCthH534S Vn/2u8sOgvDV5IN9xN3CR6/dtuKDB31r2qPvDDA2Z5QlrXFqZx2wSxTI2MUB36p9 hcLig8YVrlyAWeSE6ppKpy6D1uie06LiLiGbA9SKxqkfZK0htQK9DM2Y9ARR6fBY KOLUwlPP508F8bMxoDw1QYUcnOoodSHEj8lWIWy0nqxZWhzYtI96mc0fYR5UVxFH U2+sMxDreT+tYSpKEsOQlQtum1gEdLcCE95HR7y1l2Xd9ozyTRVtBg9hUJtd9iTV 799UUHm+Aazg1oJJb5BBeB9mxHSDLVIlWB4l17OrJqPi4OHUqgyCRq7KSVVSNarS Mtjv5uOgiLUwLkGJir8lIRYmgN8qDAQ1x7mGZI0Ymew0dq/hIRjUOKLZbmNok/pb SqaKj4gWijX1xutM4hSG3OUHNc6IgDyGrg7YxT3Ibbj20BJE///lPByDPnnrUjJm NArmcuonifyqD+gaPRI/d/qGBMdCjZ5Nfg2q20xnDjUlbBka7413CzKYqozfGrlt CyrA77J/ezRRXN7Riy7aaaMxCKoXxJ5j+yWHLDfB9QXhOX8OytdPtdho5hGi7UHc SE9w1+KRkRxdVw7cX9KBnj3caLMFcUcgSjKdZ0WCol2BNfw6b20/jf90G2NT9BsG Ck5MgNaqpeh2PQt/96/60Q== =Brmv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----