Bug#1084924: The system-log-daemon virtual package

Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:12:56 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte
Message-ID <87msi2d0lz.fsf__23943.7893543922$1731550527$gmane$org@melete.silentflame.com>
Hello,

On Fri 08 Nov 2024 at 02:00pm +01, Helmut Grohne wrote:

> In my understanding, system-log-daemon virtual package originally served
> two distinct purposes:
>
>  1. If you depend on it, then you can assume that messages emitted using
>     syslog(3) or written to /dev/log are handled in some means.
>  2. The dependency system prevents two implementations of a /dev/log
>     handling service from being installed at the same time.
>
> When I say "exclusion mechanism" I refer to the second purpose. My
> understanding of the conversation thus far is that we have broad
> consensus for continued use of the virtual package for preventing
> coinstallation of two logging services (2) while we have some
> disagreement about how to express a requirement on logging services to
> be available (1).

Thanks, I see what you mean now.

-- 
Sean Whitton
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Brmv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----