Bug#1113774: Disabling -fcf-protection in sudo for bookworm
Paul Tagliamonte <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:06:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20250902140647.GA53818__12055.7412550383$1756822163$gmane$org@dc.cant.vote> |
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:59:03PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: >Yeah I think you were right in rejecting this. I would need to read more to "get smart" here, but I think another factor to consider is the number of "true" i686 processers running this release vs the number of x86_64 processors running this release under an x86_64 kernel. My understanding from a quick read of the docs here (although, about 2 minutes worth so i'm very open to being convinced otherwise here) is that disabling this would disable CET for sudo:i386 when running under an amd64 kernel, in order to allow a i586 to run a i686 binary. paultag -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte <paultag> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEE8rctyP6kE7DHa+fOytLPCmgIXzIFAmi2+fUACgkQytLPCmgI XzKBFAgAhxEKuGm5HWTacGKSpgr2eTQfT8eOvSs8oL5h1T4ILgF9C/xS905bJ8vF +i4onzPIC8HnhpqiwLwWOEpa8w4LeetzRzWu1/qpkApa5hVBTEK9AsqJ+0hXFuZw A1u20D8PIz2bibNu+dgEoMr5CCTxJfF8WRdkI28DywJh7XEL8vL11L0ICOCFZfew mN16vcv/uI5XgoiRfIB8nY+N4GkR+mErGCkdImycgNcBdaEPfShjRoZB2tXrzXWw dpQbmEtyJz2rJ5kQxLYH4rsZ9DQgEWlhtcYiGWX2noR6EsS33xdlmtrVTpQQsuU4 zCt3YwJnB3KlvwEUCz9i24tkDEWjdw== =gkG2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----