Bug#1136336: tech-ctte: Request for intervention on Bug #1135385 (gnome-control-center donation popup)
[email protected] Mon, 11 May 2026 21:05:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <bd9a8ccc62c1975e72fd58b3406c6896ffc00103defeedc4__41695.608552412$1778533653$gmane$org@smtp.hushmail.com> |
--=_f7671b0870891380a3fcd652bc8d6fba Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" To: [email protected] Package: tech-ctte Severity: serious Followup-For: Bug #1135385 X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected] I request the Debian Technical Committee intervene regarding Bug #1135385, concerning the default-enabled donation notification in gnome-control-center, currently dismissed as a duplicate of Bug #1120511. The maintainer, Jeremy B=C3=ADcha, has declined to address the core issue, that a default-enabled fundraising notification violates Debian Social Contract Clause 4: "We will be guided by the needs of our users and free software community. We will place their interests first."=20 This feature imposes an external agenda (GNOME Foundation fundraising) without user consent, undermining user autonomy and Debian=E2=80=99s ethica= l foundation. It is not a minor usability concern, but a policy and philosophical violation, analogous to Bug #964359 (SMPlayer donation nag), which was patched out due to reputational risk. The maintainer=E2=80=99s responses (closing as duplicate, telling users to run commands to disable the notification, etc), fails to engage with the ethical and policy dimensions. This constitutes a willful disregard of Debian=E2=80=99s stewardship principles. The issue leaves no remaining ambiguity and is a direct conflict between upstream agendas and Debian=E2=80=99s values. Per Debian Constitution =C2=A76.1.4, I ask the TC to: Overrule the maintainer=E2=80=99s decision to dismiss Bug #1135385 and to discontinue ignoring Bug #1120511. Require that the donation notification be either: Patched out of the Debian package, or Disabled by default with a clear, informed opt-in mechanism. Clarify that maintainers must consider Debian Social Contract violations as actionable, especially when upstream decisions conflict with user interests. Consider whether the maintainer=E2=80=99s continued refusal to address = a documented policy violation constitutes an unambiguous failure of stewardship. References: Bug #1135385: https://bugs.debian.org/1135385 Bug #1120511: https://bugs.debian.org/1120511 Bug #964359 (SMPlayer): https://bugs.debian.org/964359 --=_f7671b0870891380a3fcd652bc8d6fba Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" <span style=3D"font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: 150%;"><sp= an style=3D"font-family:Arial;font-size:14px;line-height:150%;">To: submit@= bugs.debian.org<br>Package: tech-ctte<br>Severity: serious<br>Followup-For:= Bug #1135385<br>X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], debian-ctte= @lists.debian.org<br><br>I request the Debian Technical Committee intervene= regarding Bug #1135385, concerning the default-enabled donation notificati= on in gnome-control-center, currently dismissed as a duplicate of Bug #1120= 511.<br><br>The maintainer, Jeremy B=C3=ADcha, has declined to address the = core issue, that a default-enabled fundraising notification violates Debian= Social Contract Clause 4: "We will be guided by the needs of our users and= free software community. We will place their interests first." <br><b= r>This feature imposes an external agenda (GNOME Foundation fundraising) wi= thout user consent, undermining user autonomy and Debian=E2=80=99s ethical = foundation. It is not a minor usability concern, but a policy and philosoph= ical violation, analogous to Bug #964359 (SMPlayer donation nag), which was= patched out due to reputational risk.<br><br>The maintainer=E2=80=99s resp= onses (closing as duplicate, telling users to run commands to disable the n= otification, etc), fails to engage with the ethical and policy dimensions. = This constitutes a willful disregard of Debian=E2=80=99s stewardship princi= ples. The issue leaves no remaining ambiguity and is a direct conflict betw= een upstream agendas and Debian=E2=80=99s values.<br><br>Per Debian Constit= ution =C2=A76.1.4, I ask the TC to:<br> Overrule the maintaine= r=E2=80=99s decision to dismiss Bug #1135385 and to discontinue ignoring Bu= g #1120511.<br> Require that the donation notification be eith= er:<br> Patched out of the Debian package, or<br= > Disabled by default with a clear, informed opt= -in mechanism.<br> Clarify that maintainers must consider Debi= an Social Contract violations as actionable, especially when upstream decis= ions conflict with user interests.<br> Consider whether the ma= intainer=E2=80=99s continued refusal to address a documented policy violati= on constitutes an unambiguous failure of stewardship.<br><br>References:<br= > Bug #1135385: <a href=3D"https://bugs.debian.org/1135385">ht= tps://bugs.debian.org/1135385</a><br> Bug #1120511: <a href=3D= "https://bugs.debian.org/1120511">https://bugs.debian.org/1120511</a><br>&n= bsp; Bug #964359 (SMPlayer): <a href=3D"https://bugs.debian.org/9643= 59">https://bugs.debian.org/964359</a></span></span> --=_f7671b0870891380a3fcd652bc8d6fba--