Re: debbugs and debian-ports.org (was Re: Bug#660149 closed by Francesca Ciceri <[email protected]> (Re: atari-bootstrap: fails to boot kernel))
Mehdi Dogguy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance,gmane.linux.debian.devel.debbugs,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/13/2012 02:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > > @ debbugs people: Is there any chance to include in the BTS also > not-released ports? I mean, I know they technically are not Debian, > but also non-free is not Debian and it is in the BTS ;) Are there > reasons to avoid it, or is it technically possible to track also > packages in debian-ports.org? > What's the point in doing that? Really. IMHO, if debbugs folks could invest some time to fix something, it would be integrating debian-backports information in BTS. non-free is different from non-official ports… since they live in the official archive/servers. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]