Re: smtube, youtube-dl and other apps that work with youtube

nodiscc <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.desktop
Message-ID <CAL0ZwR4YHwCQZZD+X+fmoY6yaBZ7cVY2-Fe6iiEAHqN79TqynA@mail.gmail.com>
I think the proper Debian way to handle such tools, is to install them
from backports. youtube-dl from buster-backports is currently
up-to-date with upstream
https://packages.debian.org/buster-backports/youtube-dl.

Maybe debian-installer does not make it clear enough that enabling
backports is strongly recommended for desktop machines?

For smtube you would need to find a maintainer for a backported package.

Le mer. 15 juil. 2020 à 08:29, erkin-peAqNgFDqfpWk0Htik3J/[email protected] <erkin-peAqNgFDqfpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> As far as I know, youtube-dl can be installed and updated through pip.
> I think updating packages if we can is a better idea than removing
> them. It might be useful to put a warning saying that "Youtube is a
> propriatery script and makes breaking changes very fast. If this
> software doesn't work you can try getting a newer version from the
> python package index at your own risk. "
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 00:51 +0200, Ervin Dine wrote:
> > YouTube changes it's code fast.
> > This renders programs that are free and open source working with
> > YouTube obsolete very fast unless they update too.
> > Such is the case with smtube, youtube-dl in the official Debian 10
> > stable repositories. They are completely useless for youtube.
> > Should Debian update broken packages or remove packages that rely on
> > proprietary services?
> >
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.