Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations
Jaycee Santos <jlsantos-g/[email protected]> Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:42:05 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.desktop,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5gMFMVRxM6KTziRoGIGKnLBhOZJ_KWHB7JthiEDqntEshgoRri23i90NSkgxQe7CAw03JpF1uW4_DWcbHVbuByszvCO0aBhnHOhpvSoQo3o=@protonmail.com> |
On Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 at 1:05 PM, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 23.09.21 um 21:35 schrieb Jaycee Santos: > > Is there a reason why to choose gnome-network-manager over something like > > nm-tray for LXDE? > > I think nm-tray (being based on Qt5) is a reasonable choice for LXQT (which is also Qt5 based). LXDE on the other hand uses GTK, so I think network-manager-gnome is a better fit there. (both disk footprint and memory usage wise) Ah. My apologies. I thought nm-applet was provided by nm-tray. I was wrong. I did not know that nm-applet was part of network-manager-gnome! So I agree with network-manager-gnome being a better fit for LXDE. Apparently, I was already using it. Jaycee