Re: Technical objection to KDE double-click default in Debian 13 - Request for corrective action before release
Aurélien COUDERC <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jul 2025 17:31:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.project,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.desktop,gmane.linux.debian.devel.qt-kde |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5911970.DvuYhMxLoT@grummly> |
Le mercredi 23 juillet 2025, 16:08:18 heure d=E2=80=99=C3=A9t=C3=A9 d=E2=80= =99Europe centrale Aaron Rainbolt a =C3=A9crit : > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 4:02=E2=80=AFAM Lucy <[email protected]> wrote: > This shows up as being 98% AI-generated according to GPTZero [1]. If > this really matters to you, why are you using an AI slop generator to > write your petition? All this does is waste time and annoy people. >=20 > I can see why people would use LLMs for translating emails or for > polishing text, but I wish there was a rule against emails to the > Debian mailing lists in which the meaningful portion of the content is > AI-generated. >=20 > (Repost because I accidentally sent this off-list the first time...) >=20 > [1] https://gptzero.me/ Damn, I was really tricked into answering a thoughtful, handcrafted answer= =E2=80=A6 =F0=9F=99=82 I should have detected that with the Wayland bait. But maybe that=E2=80=99s why I found the whole argument entirely unconvinci= ng=E2=80=A6 Thanks for sharing. Happy hacking, =2D- Aur=C3=A9lien