Re: Bug#278747: dictionaries-common: Please support iso-8859-15
Lionel Elie Mamane <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:55:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dictionary |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:17:03PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 11:26:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:55:43PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: >>> Since euro symbol is unlikely to be present in a ispell dict, for >>> the ispell dict iso-latin-15 is in practice equivalent to >>> iso-latin-1, >> Not for French; the euro symbol is not the only difference between >> latin 1 and latin 9. Relevant for French is the replacement of >> I-don't-remember-what by the "o written in the e" (o dans l'e), >> namely ? (if you see it correctly). This character is used e.g. in >> c?ur (heart). > I have looked at both ifrench and ifrench-gut dicts and seems that > both have what looks like an iso-8859-15 entry in the aff file ifrench-gut is (at my request and my insistence) encoded in iso-8859-15, as this is the only encoding that fully supports French (I must admit I forgot about Unicode (UTF-8, UTF-16, UTF-32, etc). There is a backwards compatibility mode for iso-8859-1, with the option "latin1". My plan, once latin 9 is accepted by the dictionaries policy, was to have an entry with encoding latin9 and one entry with encoding latin0 and Extended-Character-Mode latin1. Actually, I was about to file this suggestion in the BTS when I saw that latin9 is forbidden by the dictionaries policy. > Even if emacs20 is no longer in sarge, dicts using latin0 should > probably confict with it. Argh, no. It makes sense to have emacs20 and a dictionary that won't work in it installed at the same time! They both have their good and correct uses even if they won't work in collaboration. -- Lionel