Re: Bug#278747: dictionaries-common: Please support iso-8859-15
Agustin Martin <agustin.martin-a/[email protected]> Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:56:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dictionary |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I sent this message to dict-common-dev from a misconfigured system and I guess it was rejected, sending it again, next week below referred to this week On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > My plan, once latin 9 is accepted by the dictionaries policy, was to > have an entry with encoding latin9 and one entry with encoding latin0 > and Extended-Character-Mode latin1. Actually, I was about to file this > suggestion in the BTS when I saw that latin9 is forbidden by the > dictionaries policy. That sounds reasonable at the current state of the emacs problem. If there are no objections or somebody propose something better I plan to include iso-8859-15 in ispell.el at some time in next week, and modify the policy for that. > > Even if emacs20 is no longer in sarge, dicts using latin0 should > > probably confict with it. > > Argh, no. It makes sense to have emacs20 and a dictionary that won't > work in it installed at the same time! They both have their good and > correct uses even if they won't work in collaboration. > Agreed, better not to add incompatibilities unless really needed. The only dependency to be added will be for dicts having a iso-8859-15 emacs entry on a dictionaries-common version at least the one providing iso-8859-15. Cheers, -- Agustin