Re: ispell 3.3.02 uploaded to experimental
Agustin Martin <[email protected]> Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:05:37 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dictionary |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Martin-=C9ric Racine = > = > (sorry about the huge Cc list. :-( ) Shortening it and adding dict-common-dev. > | At the risk of sounding silly, I really have to ask: > | = > | Why does Debian even bother with ispell anymore, considering that > | almost everything out there has been converted to use aspell or > | myspell instead of ispell, plus the FSF considers aspell as the only > | GNU -supported spell checker? > = > Afaik emacs for instance still defaults to using ispell, so while GNU > might have said that in some context, it's not particularly enforced. FSF Emacs has aspell as default (see e.g. emacs-snapshot). For backwards compatibility I was keeping ispell as Debian default (for everything but emacs-snapshot) until squeeze release. I already changed that to aspell to have a similar behavior for all Emacs flavours. AFAIK, the only remaining ispell-only feature is suport for pseudo-charsets (writing things like \'a instead of 'a) and lower memory footprint. aspell had support for pseudo-charsets in its TODO list, but do not know its status. IIRC hunspell does not have it. Ragards, -- = Agustin