Re: Bug#761032: dutch: please build package hunspell-nl

On Wed, September 10, 2014 09:01, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Source: dutch
> Version: please provide hunspell-nl
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It's not at all evident that someone can mix hunspell & myspell
> dictionaries packages.
>
> myspell-nl could maybe provide virtual package name hunspell-nl
>
> or maybe it is better to create a new hunspell-nl binary package.
>
> or you could also follow example of "myspell-sv-se" that is
> a transitionnal package that depends on "hunspell-sv-se" .

We in general follow the policy set out by dictionaries-common, so the
spell checker packages in Debian all behave consistently.

I'm Cc'ing the dict-common-dev mailing list to find out how this is
handled or should be handled in general. Then of course we'd be happy to
implement this.


Cheers,
Thijs