Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

Andrew Ruthven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation
Message-ID <f1b569a55508f0e9c90718c028058fdea7314772.camel__26594.2177780502$1750056208$gmane$org@etc.gen.nz>
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They
> > are
> > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below
> > in the
> > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section:
> > 
> >     request-tracker4 has been removed from trixie. Its replacement is
> >     request-tracker5.
> 
> Is there a reason that request-tracker4 was not made a transiitional
> package depending on request-tracker5?
> (if the answer is that something is incompatible, we should say what
> and, ideally, link to how to migrate data etc)

It isn't as simple as making a transitional package. If there are
customisations then they will need to be ported over. Upgrade instructions
are in the request-tracker5 package, and the description notes that it can
be installed simultaneously with request-tracker4.

I have followed the format used previously in bookworm[0]. But we could add
something like "Instructions on how to upgrade are in the request-tracker5
package, which can be installed simultaneously."

Cheers,
Andrew


[0]
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#noteworthy-obsolete-packages
-- 
Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand
[email protected]         |
Catalyst Cloud:           | This space intentionally left blank
 https://catalystcloud.nz |
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.