Bug#1053602: Documentation inconsistency: default umask in Securing Debian Manual online vs. actual default on trixie

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Alma Madeleine wrote:
> sebul:
> > Status: Published; very outdated, no updates of content since many
> > years.
> The date of the PDF file is 01.06.24, 22:53:17.  So folks have been at
> least recompiling the document.  If the document is outdated and no longer
> reflects the reality, the file should be taken offline or prominently
> marked as outdated, say, on the very first page. As of now, the word
> “outdated“ doesn't even occur in the English document (or at least not
> findable in evince).
>

See https://bugs.debian.org/1053602 , "harden-doc: low qualitiy of content",
Severity: serious, filed october 2023.

Increasing severity of that bug sounds good to me...  (It would make sure
this won't be shipped with upcoming stable Debian release, and would help
removing https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals.en.html#securing . )

Thanks, Bye,

Joost