Bug#1125722: dpkg-gensymbols: error if symbols file is too lax
Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Jan 2026 12:20:40 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOU6tAAPNEpm9qeSPAG+egDsmTy3cEq3divxdJNCVubFzsp+pg__6448.6902135954$1768595013$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi! Thanks for a quick reply! > > I've come across several symbols files that use wildcards to match > > basically any symbol. Doesn't this make the symbols file kind of moot, > > as it will never detect any symbols that got removed and it will > > always match any symbols added? > > No, this is intended to be used for well maintained libraries. See > the symver documentation in deb-src-symbols(5). Yes I see in https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dpkg-dev/deb-src-symbols.5.en.html that his can be used, but my point here is that if the entire file is only wildcards and nothing else, tracking symbols is kind of moot, right? Take a look at the file https://sources.debian.org/src/openssl/3.5.4-1/debian/libssl3t64.symbols - does such a file make sense?