Bug#966280: followup to #966280

Martin Quinson <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:05:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs
Message-ID <147f627fa11f3bc23ff5c5dd3494ae2743b2e84f.camel__10243.1420282059$1781089887$gmane$org@ens-rennes.fr>
--=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I agree that your current patch is both the best thing I could imagine to f=
ix
the issue, and a bit verbose in 99.99% of the cases, i.e. when there is no =
line
ending issue.

I would not be hurted if you close the bug as is. I would love to have a be=
tter
idea, but I have none. Please proceed.

Thanks for the time devoted to thinking about this,
Mt

--=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=vaOb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ--