Bug#966280: followup to #966280
Martin Quinson <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:05:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <147f627fa11f3bc23ff5c5dd3494ae2743b2e84f.camel__10243.1420282059$1781089887$gmane$org@ens-rennes.fr> |
--=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I agree that your current patch is both the best thing I could imagine to f= ix the issue, and a bit verbose in 99.99% of the cases, i.e. when there is no = line ending issue. I would not be hurted if you close the bug as is. I would love to have a be= tter idea, but I have none. Please proceed. Thanks for the time devoted to thinking about this, Mt --=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEET76cTupS7xPVQWYSmL2XJE9zvqcFAmopRNwACgkQmL2XJE9z vqc04Q/+L+65VI/DEbqEi8Mu8FIoZIdyMAfgwsx2oeRKbTmY0M4wewxeFN4EVcEg qdbH+8H9E5bqdvoixo8snnA5sci/B6HgxcQKmXKmTVx1Z3oD3YvYtyTGzXA6mmne zt0KEZ4r/5Hg4cJAEaY+XEN004KJPXW3xRMdcb+dGfgGebDbrT2HtC1736lkmtRH COlQwmkBmzqmVX3JH5pdpbJI0g6r8BjPr0MbXnKuQ6katdZ8IpzcbTbrbtzhaFvn MhQ6rs1VVWpI+jXajAtYTK0JpYTAuH0AzTVXDEgYu3/UqyF0WEx+WU/xmfzO3Byh kSkmU5fXUMk5Mfp/g3EPPvy0b1tT6shJC+g9INiLE/krkbqkmau2FuPA7pazgw0Z yvf//zziTB/qR3yKIu9jOQtn4IfhWwICKP0QMayiglvhvlGHK7q8lv8+YR2m3bfc /6k4XnY4Q79rkOQIWD1HeLvWjudeKac93LFgsDc+6my/VEKYCNJoUY+TW28rkfG6 v08g8VDw8gu1kcLDAzR8etAU6xTF5NmRRVAkEW+UbgTomTZPf797EeI6iNEByJ9x QL36QmPe/xf2cEeLmmHc57fPPtQS2EmrdQSEB/s2xIjMQF+FwqBxRSnd6Bx63nhD JWGcbsxrMuqIZn1IpYOMnLHXLEQ+Z2EWCe8TPwFZTie98/j/7H4= =vaOb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-O9lZWAsNdhevA6xm9IFJ--