Bug#1139334: [INTL:ro] Updated translation of "dpkg" to Romanian

Remus-Gabriel Chelu <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:07:44 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs
Message-ID <eff419a83068c144d2efea31c3fc69cd__33308.3503109933$1782209368$gmane$org@disroot.org>
În 22.06.2026 02:15, Guillem Jover a scris:

> Hi!
> 
> On Mon, 2026-06-08 at 20:02:29 +0200, Remus-Gabriel Chelu wrote:
> 
>> Package: dpkg
>> Version: 1.23.7
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: l10n, patch
> 
>> Please find the updated Romanian po file translation for
>> dpkg-program attached.
>> 
>> It should be put as "po/ro.po" in your package build tree.
>> 
>> If you update your template, please contact me so I can update the
>> Romanian translation; or, if you prefer, contact the Debian Romanian
>> mailing list <[email protected]> for this purpose.
> 
> Thanks for the update, I've queued it locally and will be included in 
> my
> next push.
> 
> BTW it would be helpful if you could mark msgids that are unclear, 
> wrong
> or that could be improved in the .po file with either an XXX or FIXME
> comment in English to make it easier to spot.
> 

Ok, I'll leave comments with the things that seem off to me.

> Some of them I agree need a rewording, and were like this before my
> time, some I might have introduced where being non-native might not
> always help. :)
> 

Unfortunately, when taking over an old project, the new person in charge
is “to blame” both for the old mistakes/errors made by others and for
the new ones he or she introduces.

> I've done already an update and unification pass over all strings, and
> have some pending commits to push, so I hope the situation will improve
> with the next upstream release, but for anything remaining I'd 
> appreciate
> being told (either with the above mentioned comments or with bug 
> reports).
> 

This intention and effort to fix old errors/mistakes (and possibly some
not-so-old ones) is to be appreciated.
In my future "bug-wishlists", I will mention the presence (if any) of
these comments in the attached ro.po file.

>> PS: apologies for (re)naming the dselect program as deselect,
>> in the previous message "Bug#1139332"; it was due to haste,,,
> 
> No problem!
> 

Tks! What is the current status of the fix for bug #1139332, which 
contains
the updated translation of “dselect”?