Bug#1139334: [INTL:ro] Updated translation of "dpkg" to Romanian
Remus-Gabriel Chelu <[email protected]> Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:07:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <eff419a83068c144d2efea31c3fc69cd__33308.3503109933$1782209368$gmane$org@disroot.org> |
În 22.06.2026 02:15, Guillem Jover a scris: > Hi! > > On Mon, 2026-06-08 at 20:02:29 +0200, Remus-Gabriel Chelu wrote: > >> Package: dpkg >> Version: 1.23.7 >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: l10n, patch > >> Please find the updated Romanian po file translation for >> dpkg-program attached. >> >> It should be put as "po/ro.po" in your package build tree. >> >> If you update your template, please contact me so I can update the >> Romanian translation; or, if you prefer, contact the Debian Romanian >> mailing list <[email protected]> for this purpose. > > Thanks for the update, I've queued it locally and will be included in > my > next push. > > BTW it would be helpful if you could mark msgids that are unclear, > wrong > or that could be improved in the .po file with either an XXX or FIXME > comment in English to make it easier to spot. > Ok, I'll leave comments with the things that seem off to me. > Some of them I agree need a rewording, and were like this before my > time, some I might have introduced where being non-native might not > always help. :) > Unfortunately, when taking over an old project, the new person in charge is “to blame” both for the old mistakes/errors made by others and for the new ones he or she introduces. > I've done already an update and unification pass over all strings, and > have some pending commits to push, so I hope the situation will improve > with the next upstream release, but for anything remaining I'd > appreciate > being told (either with the above mentioned comments or with bug > reports). > This intention and effort to fix old errors/mistakes (and possibly some not-so-old ones) is to be appreciated. In my future "bug-wishlists", I will mention the presence (if any) of these comments in the attached ro.po file. >> PS: apologies for (re)naming the dselect program as deselect, >> in the previous message "Bug#1139332"; it was due to haste,,, > > No problem! > Tks! What is the current status of the fix for bug #1139332, which contains the updated translation of “dselect”?