Bug#1061450: dpkg-dev: Please add bash completion for dpkg-buildpackage
Guillem Jover <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:01:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <al4AGH88sNs6pESm__47830.7161409006$1784545407$gmane$org@thunder.hadrons.org> |
Hi! On Sun, 2026-07-19 at 23:57:28 +0800, Cheng Li wrote: > Apologies for the slow reply =E2=80=94 work has been keeping me busy thes= e past > few weeks. No worries! > I see the transfer has landed in the meantime: bash-completion deprecated > its dpkg completions, and the import plus the dpkg-source rework are now > on dpkg main. Nice! Yes, although I'm still working on the --help output improvements, which in some cases affect the bash-completion parsing of available options =66rom a program. But I don't think this should affect dpkg-buildpackage for now, except for the missing =3D for options with arguments, which I'll be working on either for this release or next. > Since scripts/completion/bash/ only has dpkg-source so far, I'd like to > take dpkg-buildpackage as discussed =E2=80=94 bash only, following the st= yle and > layout of the dpkg-source file on main. If you've already started on it > locally, sorry for the delay, just tell me and I'll pick another program > instead. Sure, work on dpkg-buildpackage would be much appreciated. I only have a couple of incomplete local commits to try to handle dselect's --color options, but otherwise nothing else, no. > Would you prefer a merge request on Salsa, or a patch to this bug? MRs are disabled on salsa (for multiple reasons), so a patch series here for preservation purposes and if you want a branch somewhere would work. Thanks, Guillem