Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new default

On 2024-11-29 11:08 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:

Lots of good stuff...

My minor contribution is to note a typo/grammaro in the default bug text/template:

>    The primary reason why this was such a small issue where:

Should be:

The primary reasons why this was such a small issue were:

(or maybe
The primary reason why this was such a small issue was:
?, but there are two reasons given so this seems unlikely to be what was meant
)

Context:

>      1) Wide-spread use of `Rules-Requires-Root: no` to limit which
>         packages could be affected (about 50% of the archive had
>         migrated away from `fakeroot`).
> 
>      2) A quick fix to `debhelper` to remove the reliance on
>         `fakeroot` when assembling `-dbgsym` packages.

A detail, I know, but we take detail-correction seriously round here. :-)

Wookey
-- 
Principal hats:  Debian, Wookware
http://wookware.org/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEER4nvI8Pe/wVWh5yq+4YyUahvnkcFAmdJ7yQACgkQ+4YyUahv
nkelLhAAh6fPqp2IguJVI2J6SV+afiR3rqJwvhmXbyidq3D9ofP1p2l/14m59oFC
pcl20VPuI3A0i7kUCaRXtBAxsyVqYY57kMSXg3nL6Aoe9xEcUrhVJBn0nLSV8+hz
q+JIhOVOoXTyKevQZeC4RDO8WjmU8Qm2K/CvX7laKlHJlvBFH2hRS/tlrtkh2s6+
9eprAI/4E+giBL3ub1fRofpB6t13Ns/um5TlvPjscRsm1NbJlAWoUos1XarsoA8z
MJhV2EhZ/nOBNdB9e0gkmLC8Uqdw/Yxm45MN+zJTtZho3bSYCHVU+IEIalAOLL4z
cgShzJ9J+jkhBTKb8R/zQcu6lU8vkF6Fzr2tLRUNPQm5hRu+7pH65n5F6ahMlr0r
FRJfvf70ETM8ObmxZD85c1ndzv8dnI3bjrjDdTCpO05dQu4ewM5XGwFe5g+TVIZU
441FBKpa9NnhZDri7QWbtC5VILUNPnHqAcdQpcmbPB5aEwe05m+yzbTTiH4KEUzP
hshK6Qn1/Xd+JIHZ/oosPHnlPLb7QKuwHwzb9fE9KFdwO67an8G6iuYpxdVWVSVi
YEZRTiEpu20kHM4y4BYf6+bWXmbH3+5+NP0FM7b83wsw+RfxDazFfJg94UWAtFP+
FXlYCSXep+hNsqrzZhUyK7n5bB6f8o9OMTrewnccEgD9tai6TrY=
=P8Z/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----