Re: Bug#1109499: bacula-director-sqlite3: fails to dist-upgrade from bookworm to trixie
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Jul 2025 11:06:17 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris Hofstaedtler: > [...] > > The preinst script should be this: https://binarycontrol.debian.net/cache/unstable/bacula-common/preinst > which does not invoke systemd-tmpfiles. > > I wonder whats really happening. Is dpkg invoking the new postinst > (at postinst time), but putting "pre-installation" into the log message? > > Or is it really invoking the postinst at preinst time? > > Both look like a problem to me, and not something that Pre-Depends > should solve? > > Best, > Chris > FWIW, I checked the stable version of bacula-common and it has the same story. The `systemd-tmpfiles` call only appears in the `postinst`, so there is no way I can find that a `bacula-common.preinst` call would trigger `systemd-tmpfiles` (the stable version of the preinst is a subset of the testing one; I know `dpkg` says it is the `new pre-installation script` in the log but I checked all the same). Best regards, Niels
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE9ecZmu9eXGflVYc/dA1oiINl0okFAmh7YAkACgkQdA1oiINl 0omttAf/XierwI17d4sUqWTfyzFzs26LXq6mnzZ5H97Dv5bjbspk2fziD64oECuJ WOtCAUVvJyaKvnKYgG/vh4o6noLNwUyd3wctpahS3rqrlu7xcB9fJyoIo7MOAVja 8njuDjo2VaH2HYwM/wbPzPAcfwn9B7DeLRCC8xhTThzy1Qw7tP9OatxhRoq4JOcP yoQkmeQwvn4FHuivgD4fTgu+gAb8vYvw7ank+9K9iQ+wFmNlfYd6l3NyvUbSKnpO KLWQuzCwFwRzLweFdxZZt+3Spj+2mWUXTfu4Q/xniVpQUZrlCJZQTF+FT++qy/z+ 8LkTlsYmv7wk41O8B5tj8OpSxSXzKg== =7Xlh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----