Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for powerpcspe?
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:14:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.dpkg.general,gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2025-09-03 04:37:27 [+0200], Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! Hi , > Was checking last year the status of several of the dpkg arch > definitions, and whether they are in use and/or useful, and > stumbled over the powerpcspe one. > > This was requested in #568123, #575158. It got removed from Debian and > was never moved into Debian ports. Is it still being used anywhere? > If this is being used at all, I have no problem with keeping this, the > definition just seemed somewhat dead/unused to me. It was in debian-ports and kept alive/ used for a while. But feel free to remove all trace of powerpcspe, e500 and so on. No need to keep them around anymore. I don't think that powerpcspe users use recent software simply because support has been removed from gcc as of gcc-10: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=23d3e2d5a7858670c3e4f6854e7a4d439278b128 > Thanks, > Guillem Sebastian