Re: The emacs-31 branch during the next release cycle

Eli Zaretskii [30/Jun  4:50pm +03] wrote:
> Now, it's true that people running NN.k will not see regressions
> introduced on the emacs-NN branch after NN.k was released, but if
> those regressions are reported by people running master, and if we try
> reproducing them on emacs-NN before deciding whether the regression
> should be fixed there or on master, why does all of that matter?
> [...]
> Then they will see on master the regressions introduced in emacs-NN,
> and we should remember to try the recipes on emacs-NN even if they are
> reported for master.  Then we can decide on which branch to fix the
> regressions.
>
> What am I missing?

I have in mind regressions that only show up on the emacs-NN branch even
if an identical fix is on both that branch and master.  This sometimes
happens due to complex interactions.