Who is using langupdate?
Neil Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm not sure about whether langupdate is necessary. The idea was good, to make selection of TDebs simpler, but somehow, I doubt that many Emdebian installations are being used in such a way that either the configured locales or the package selection changes substantially on a daily basis. Most, if using TDebs at all, will know which packages need to expose translated strings *and* which locales are going to be configured on a per-device basis. Once installed, TDebs will automatically update just as with normal packages - the only merit of langupdate was that it would identify new translations and the translations for packages which are installed *after* the initial setup. According to Debian, a handful of people are "regularly" using langupdate and I'm curious because I'm not at all sure it's actually working any more. Does it work? Why is it being used? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3idCsACgkQiAEJSii8s+PQlgCg17ZLUSvv40OGoa4wKEXhyC3A YSkAoO5ydSkMdORCWU6NI6GGC8taZbDr =HaSM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----