Re: Debian Social Contract

Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11-06-17 at 11:08am, Neil Williams wrote:
> Do we already consider ourselves (as Emdebian) to be bound by the 
> Debian Social Contract?
> 
> http://www.debian.org/social_contract
> 
> I suspect the answer is Yes. I can't see anything in the contract that 
> would affect what Emdebian is trying to achieve.
> 
> It is probably worth, therefore, putting exactly this statement on the 
> www.emdebian.org website front page in the interests of clarity over 
> the trademark and name usage etc. I propose to do this in the next few 
> days.

I think that is a good move in the right direction.

When assured that Emdebian consider itself bound by Debian Social 
Contract, next step is to have 

I believe, however (without being an expert on licensing) that it does 
not affect the use of Debian trademark and name: Anyone can choose to 
obey Debian Social Contract, but Debian needs to approve of any external 
use.

So when we (Emdebian) are certain that we match Debian to a sensible 
degree (i.e. by obeying Social Contract, and fair amounts of Policy), we 
should a) ask Debian for permission formally for the use of their name, 
and/or b) ask Debian to "make room for us" as a Debian-internal project.

I write "make room for us", as I believe it requires changes to Debian 
Policy.

Personally I find b) most ideal, but since I would expect that to take 
time and the process potentially stir big debates, I guess it still 
makes sense to do a) as an intermediary step.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJN+0FpAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhMkwQAJ6T8HrjQLVqMIQsmlrM2OU7
staK7wDVa8OCMu1NenesikmiMxt8sI5+cO8A39cRvj6gGjOdmW+TnCUJbFJ/SOH4
boFO56qaic3x03CMrGTRW2hxhTgn4vBdFzhYa5PRjz2ZzXDcjqkwoM2fh43+hDSi
mjU1IV6WPsX+cZESCtpYYp6pRoVhoEl8zaWI+ZUyh0m0S3N05uGDgPj465BFSHwY
3U6M3pYo9ahBpYSfWCVzFeM/qmbz+QE7IZPenPPXFvDFgPH8MmkHg6P92FoKVyRV
iAwI8Ad8rHFbCaqsMrEPP5yAcMd4jX+9HcsPKuX0SdUUTDTOT9bHnNspEZp8ON8R
szop8B2YU25KE5gfwtgOUdqZ2oawL76dKzp3jaDBtDu8xaSK21z3e/PTNBrNF46l
I/mxLI24dJ8ssA+Rv1cq3rQtFWriWY1iVHwMxJ84dq1YvG27fVMHjvqY5Oe3ZD/g
GkW4dYr23BimbVKDoEU7ZKzBdBe8JBf1nW1l9+JCylr6pYM8r3IaH0GH6uSjtjQp
a7ercQPizfbx8Tc/phJJ9cRZ1n2X7jtPhcIxiCAg9JVe5FZ/9AlPsXs3gjPWPL3V
CnMpk5iwpzQt2N9XERp0HdD0LtrhvpelIZCmvKu5btjoDG4IhGXwo7j/YbL7j3go
a57p6k1syBiDpLuPKF2E
=M0zE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.