Re: multistrap fails when aptsources not specified
Neil Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:12:06 +0200 "Wachholz, Ruediger" <[email protected]> wrote: > multistrap fails when aptsources is not specified within multistrap.conf: Please file a bug report (severity normal), the --simulate option should prevent that from being a problem. > As the embedded system i'm thinking of will not be allowed to be updated by apt > i think it should be valid not to specify any update repositories, isn't it? The aptsources will be a single file, two lines long. If you specify cleanup=true then the actual apt cache data will be removed, as will all the packages in /var/cache/apt/archives, so having a dummy apt sources list is not a burden to the system. Many embedded systems do still want to have apt available. > Or do i have a wrong understanding of aptsources? This is more the territory of Emdebian Baked - if you don't have apt, you need to consider why this choice is made: 0: You don't have space for apt - it isn't that large and the larger dependencies will likely be brought in by apt 1: If you remove apt for reasons of space, dpkg should also be removed for the same reasons but this is a lot harder to do 2: As above, to simply not let your space be taken up by the /var/lib/apt/lists and /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin, then just specify cleanup=true to multistrap. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4XKvcACgkQk7DVr6iX/QJw2ACdGye5E2QXieLETBvLTkB5jPYW wSwAniatabmjL3bROVSgBfBLi2Hrdc0Y =SOqB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----