Re: multistrap fails when aptsources not specified

Neil Williams <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:12:06 +0200
"Wachholz, Ruediger" <[email protected]> wrote:

> multistrap fails when aptsources is not specified within multistrap.conf:

Please file a bug report (severity normal), the --simulate option
should prevent that from being a problem. 
 
> As the embedded system i'm thinking of will not be allowed to be updated by apt 
> i think it should be valid not to specify any update repositories, isn't it?

The aptsources will be a single file, two lines long. If you specify
cleanup=true then the actual apt cache data will be removed, as will
all the packages in /var/cache/apt/archives, so having a dummy apt
sources list is not a burden to the system.

Many embedded systems do still want to have apt available.

> Or do i have a wrong understanding of aptsources?

This is more the territory of Emdebian Baked - if you don't have apt,
you need to consider why this choice is made:

0: You don't have space for apt - it isn't that large and the larger
dependencies will likely be brought in by apt

1: If you remove apt for reasons of space, dpkg should also be removed
for the same reasons but this is a lot harder to do

2: As above, to simply not let your space be taken up by
the /var/lib/apt/lists and /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin, then just
specify cleanup=true to multistrap.


-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4XKvcACgkQk7DVr6iX/QJw2ACdGye5E2QXieLETBvLTkB5jPYW
wSwAniatabmjL3bROVSgBfBLi2Hrdc0Y
=SOqB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.