Re: foreign bootstrap

Geert Stappers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:55:59AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:17PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
>           <snip/> 
> > > Personally, I think that a tool which does emulated configuration of a
> > > rootfs is and should be entirely separate from multistrap. I don't
> > > think polystrap is the right name either, it isn't about the
> > > bootstrapping, it's about configuration under emulation. I have never
> > > wanted to rely on emulation and I want no part of such support.
> > 
> > I'm really bad at choosing names. I would be really glad if somebody
> > could suggest one that is fitting better.
> 
> fbf
> 
> foreign bootstrap finisher


On second thought:

Polystrap is a foreign bootstrap builder and finisher, fbbf


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/FBBF
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.