Re: cross-build-essential

Roger Leigh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +0000, Wookey wrote:
> Having just been looking at sbuild cross-support it becomes clear that
> something like this would be a very useful adititon.
> 
> Can anyone see any reason why we shouldn't just have 
> $arch-crossbuild-essential which depends on the right things?
> 
> It can easily be adjusted to be right for the distro it's in, and
> removes the need for livebuilder, sbuild, multistrap etc to know
> internally.

>From the sbuild POV, this would greatly simplify things, and make
support for all architectures much more robust.  Not having
to hard code per-arch package lists and being able to handle it
just like we currently handle build-essential would, IMO, be a
Good Thing.

If it were to use the same file format that build-essential uses,
we would be able to reuse that.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.