Re: multilib thumb code for arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc
chrysn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On IRC, wookey wrote: > getting multilib and multiarch to work at the same time is > 'interesting'. To a large degreee they are alternatives. i rather thought of them as different levels of tuning, where the different multi-arch architectures are "everything where you need a different gcc" and the different multi-lib directories are "what can be done with the same gcc". that illusion is fading as i see that while arm-none-eabi-gcc and arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc are often used differently, they can produce the same code. still, i see the case at hand more as multi-lib thing than a multi-arch thing for pragmatic reasons: we can't expect to have a debian architecture dedicated to something that won't even run linux, can we? (that would probably be :armthumb, and only contain a few packages with static libraries for embedding, which i'm currently shipping as :all). regards chrysn -- There's always a bigger fish. -- Qui-Gon Jinn
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQl31zAAoJEDmNERLTpL3hcr0P/i9IuyJ7jEp8QpyLqu9CCl9B t5YSC4c8lNm/bsqmb7qJ6u4BjIF/dGy9tQbjtwhlPbMkj+UiLnFfIjsqbwiOxC8F VYd7dubl8FtR4oT6rSRMxZ9b10cfd83MhxEY46/x7gB7wZn5+v54NiYIT6QEFrMd HVPHHVua4FzVi0zTQXlycc0AiKg7NsvpUkwujI1nwT583W9h4aM4rPxZ6woqJMPR MTTN6b4atq3PmHsVUwH5egqAW84U81iSy56atEslJIHOi8Bn6oJSUfIdJnRajoZ2 TaZDEOLBvvmWIySiQLxqCLTQuoq146FymAes1S+Sf4rta6li0rG9eh2KvERHsjv2 RKQnrqDPMKCwZGMYNqK51dg+w4eitytddseZoNKG1AHByVXnek4BNJaU5LNAyvJn KDQlZRwLmi90EvpMoeW4nRgudzkp3snfG6ZLXCAj9gAQZB3ISF6pAgi981UFx9bv IFMpCShNuKBtLUCY1xCOXwk7//FzX7mEbFYlDZOHCkkWg8DLe6AclhitvHvTHuif ukedctD1MaG8KUiKQRLkPDCjzCpVIv2cmxYK9kW4HppINF+4eD8d8wusTzO3IaJB 6vwcpew/gblnolM3vn69hjFLIHIPWAdXkf6Pkjl5bzgLWjBxvCBk5UDi0v1bcwh+ cjcFaJJUnxQhM0rlKoAI =3Iht -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----