Re: debootstrap and cdebootstrap vs systemd
[email protected] (Marco d'Itri)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.embedded,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 07, [email protected] wrote: > "Don't accept old kernels" is almost equivalent to telling many > unrelated businesses in a particular ecosystem to burn their > investments and start again from scratch, just because the SoC and/or > board vendors have a broken business model. And that's hard to explain > to business people and even hardware engineers that > a chip/board/subsystem is "unsupported" even though supply guarantees > stretch out to the year 2020 and beyond. Yes, your ecosystem is broken. That's your prerogative, but please do not pretend that Debian has to support it. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 648 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJUXJsRAAoJECv1pcEixPekhMMMAJbKwUmsN/0ehc5udXqnk56F OHM3cQF+2HA3eZxyazJ1cwk516VvIe32bAvm7rhzz4aWP7b5sWLb4oCu9y0HtZFe aldg0RZxQMzNjwnWBTLQxs0zc9waekyxBdOBBOdF82UQQSDPIldIX4LXGl4fxN5x 8Gp9TWdR3H25og2XRdROZgBY+Z80B/S6olFQHHilM64hX+vXffdUycaB9+vDq279 j4iETRZdOYeT4bIBuohMTS5Wp0Z4OFyzbKGtfFPu4IzU3s7Ng4HJmBuoHjxZn6HH WJrSoP3HyLe6r69lKLVk34LNvLiHx75q4i9Ujmc8gwNdKN5ybt9TBzbvO9mRgJmF figBcM1+wfys5KETTggFdtor5GUg9+l5oLPGOCIQJv9RLlmcAY9YIxfGbX3+N5QF xjo7StxPpDudWFX5XKHO+d5QAhL1ZIaB3lJ/BgGlzZoer/ftDw5p8cpp8uN68OcJ ZSbtrL2Ip3gDhgtSfFfc7faZoVjZ8zI56eecMOE5sA== =5EfL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----