Re: RFS for pysolfc and related packages [Was: [Request for review/sponsorship/packaging] rinutils - a C library of headers used by Shlomi Fish's C projects (New Thread)]
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.games |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all! On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 00:31:43 +0200 Juhani Numminen <[email protected]> wrote: > Shlomi Fish kirjoitti 3.12.2020 klo 9.35: > > Hi all! > > > Currently getting recent versions of my FOSS packaged into debian bullseye > > before the freezes is my highest priority due to the prevalence of Debian > > and its derivatives. Here is the plan/progress doc: > > > > https://github.com/shlomif/shlomif-public-notes/blob/master/notes/updating-shlomif-foss-to-their-new-releases--in-debian-bullseye-before-the-freeze.asciidoc > > > > (short URL: https://is.gd/LIdqCv ). > > PySolFC is a game maintained by Shlomi Fish, so I'll branch off of his thread. > I'd like to update PySolFC to the latest upstream version, and have three > actionable requests for sponsorship: > > * https://bugs.debian.org/975662 > pyrandom2/1.0.1-2.1 (required by the other two, NMU with fix for an RC bug) > > * https://bugs.debian.org/976353 > python-pysol-cards/0.10.1-1 (ITP, new python module required by pysolfc > 2.10.1) > > * https://bugs.debian.org/976357 > pysolfc/2.10.1-1 (the current release of PySolFC) > This is just a confirmation that these packages are indeed required by the upstream pysolfc. I approve (+1) of a debian dev sponsoring them. The following pypi packages are optional and improve the user experience a little: * https://pypi.org/project/black-hole-solver/ * https://pypi.org/project/freecell-solver/ (not to be confused with the C libraries (*.so) which they wrap) Thanks! > > Best Regards, > Juhani Numminen >