Re: Updating Minetest to 5.5

Am Freitag, dem 25.02.2022 um 11:57 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> Travis Wrightsman wrote:
> 
> > What are the team's thoughts on how to move forward? Do people agree
> > that packaging the Minetest Irrlicht fork is reasonable?
> 
> I am disappointed that game developers using irrlicht are not able to
> collaborate and fix the issues in irrlicht upstream that they are
> coming across that are leading to the forks.

[...]

I agree with everything Paul wrote. Building minetest against Debian's irrlicht
package would be preferable of course. You probably don't need a new source
package just for the irrlicht fork if minetest is the only "consumer" but
minetest/irrlicht should be added to the list of embedded code copies, so that
we can keep track of security vulnerabilities. We could always split the code
later if there is demand by another package but that's not very likely I guess.
Both solutions should work. Thanks for bringing this up by the way and for the
intention to work on it.

Regards,

Markus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAABCgB9FiEErPPQiO8y7e9qGoNf2a0UuVE7UeQFAmIYd1xfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEFD
RjNEMDg4RUYzMkVERUY2QTFBODM1RkQ5QUQxNEI5NTEzQjUxRTQACgkQ2a0UuVE7
UeS69w//XmWMpRF+msQYse/wyVKTE3nAa5HL0hIA2TD14jmG3QFTosEnI9B0mzOo
sSoS6l5wBz2sbqW0NzkBwUV1aSp6oRGBVmVsHJltK0wF/E/ctgCzNWRRCnmA1/vs
qRlClL7cvBhF6VG9meNCRbF7IKGS3WiVwzh56OMILbG9lxV2Rzt8FASDjrOfov7m
M+7xtg0l04rNgEdxwbMtagcB/2u5lCmCaVqOKrG9vZpe2kCT6Ci9bUEjBMbIR47S
hSflA7/2I6ttNS2V57UUZMHKYpDbQPkCXRgqIFWWamlpswY7paGyIR3+irXOknPJ
nHa+HT1myVvi9KioUg3LWtaH4bdXsuHKzTlVtHxMdbk2kLQqzvuRzgQZith7KVfP
icPggpYDYA3o0euf71obzPxfZ4xz1ggisV5Nm3Cd/Hh8ON4hrD7Nx6L9FpeOab0/
LPTfPiBkRst1aJhyk6LOEzcQ/nUkcjCu3hd7H8hisEqoc0TwQCuONNmKLkDmyUtZ
juin9KGwofPDVRtdlYzprEaAGf33AJzjFkOsS5UFqUzZjLLNQMwJIimTpfvEpNFQ
6bliNSMm4tO38LKha4LGDuo6TI06vm5aS+YaSp9kPmEJVW9Y36LwCcWnNn8IcxyX
MajuwFh+xUys8XIOuT5DggxeDmPB8tWhIshigIPu4DA075G52Zs=
=R67M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----