Re: Mass bug filing / call for testing: dependencies on SDL 1.2
Stephen Kitt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.games,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Simon, On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:24:03 +0100, Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote: > SDL 1.2 was superseded by SDL 2 several years ago, and no longer receives > upstream maintenance or releases. Maintained software that uses SDL 1.2 > should be ported to SDL 2. Given the time scales involved, is it worth waiting for SDL 3 (soon...) before porting SDL 1.2 software? I’m assuming that SDL 3 will be available for Trixie, and this would avoid two porting efforts. Regards, Stephen
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEnPVX/hPLkMoq7x0ggNMC9Yhtg5wFAmSSnbcACgkQgNMC9Yht g5wBMBAAmOEQfKc7OcVTQDpUfXpd5j8ICLEu/sY5X1EdwNmT9LSziLxTb/Te/w9t 9tNiQjRIeQ0cMZfdI3gmfSCHFEJlS1sB9xfFIAhsAt6hFcCFNrGDp3O48mQ5TXtJ IFogQc4qTt63Dj31g/O6QwX6jUDwB8bvMLJD0a0H0IABT4XXrJs3MUWXyXpJyiZt We1S4Fu+pDjpgswnKfcyVTwibxNs4egw0rBe3uHAVpuHtuw3puizIuFQKenbv/60 X9c+2+qaz8b3GMkAFvdoHcCragDsgvh5w/dfWi2k6HAdtUfvj8C3SPKxxVEjhYTR SYN9UmdhYxpEEVwI8txJ32xbFyH1OVt3jBcf62wr50SiDL+XuB3spYoX+FoyNn9h ofDxyvCirgUG6ZWDK5NAC+QB0K9xIH9Lq92+HCZfxtjXj55LWKGdB1lvlW2ZLi/V kZhXS9RoWMEnw32UYSouf2fj06i+tY1EE8qw7skI3quvd7UPINdVcgyomI1vbwVA pUzHPDrqJ+Hd6FLNl11CRKd8A8C3CR6KkM3ngl+VnYNL2KP446AIGS1X5Q8u+5ZJ fsSQ9ss6jD+COBgU8LO39K6fpBTfoMlCnwC9dXAF6xkXXwJU0SGxr2Hi7X/eJe5Q g2srXX+KrP9evh/3DQT9ys8PWI/fh1vJNtGDtHEWDpa3gwyJpiA= =Pg83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----