Bug#1135526: marked as done (notmuch: FTBFS: *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details))
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:57:02 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.gcc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <handler.1135526.D1135526.17852036821962419.ackdone@bugs.debian.org> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1785203822-1963521-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your message dated Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:54:28 -0300 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#1135526: Possible miscompilation at -O2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1135526, regarding notmuch: FTBFS: *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation = fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) --=20 1135526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1135526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems ------------=_1785203822-1963521-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2026 23:13:49 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.1 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD, HAS_PACKAGE,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 307; hammy, 150; neutral, 399; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir, 0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--forky, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--HTo:N*Debian Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b72]:41666) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1wIx3N-000EQL-1l for [email protected]; Fri, 01 May 2026 23:13:49 +0000 Received: via submission from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=paradis.debian.org,[email protected] (verified) by mailly.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1wIx3M-0004cB-0P for [email protected]; Fri, 01 May 2026 23:13:48 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.paradis; h=Date:Message-Id:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=DwsqQJ87qShs1ZoVQym/htOMQveD5VCn7m1bI1LmgO4=; b=b3pcEXFev8DlAVb6tES8ylB1c2 hdC85aVuVS0z218c9lXIMNh8noY8ps1z835mF3i66v03E6svH1m7pyJIxdvDiohMg8hWwyBRMy33A 9HVZBZj+kegd23xEd3zhDUZToSqYYSBUyaeYXTCUg+HiFQm2hHuPUauSJjow4q9iPbcBCVPmTd9a5 mUfjRhouxFlC4O/hab2WGPE7xWDobVKXQlXt+ATRNQz97H2oLIFH7SNTD0ZeqvdHSUgo5Rj4+s4bD KrbFbCaZw4ceUVkn+67Fi/vwp+qlV0LVr1gA2PFkOXpuMCZ+glBl4uzmsvYVhujqHc3t1nHOessiu i+z6BAlw==; Received: from sanvila by paradis.debian.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1wIx3K-0005OH-2m for [email protected]; Fri, 01 May 2026 23:13:46 +0000 From: Santiago Vila <[email protected]> To: Debian BTS <[email protected]> Subject: notmuch: FTBFS: *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] Message-Id: <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 23:13:46 +0000 Delivered-To: [email protected] Package: src:notmuch Version: 0.40-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs forky sid Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, this package failed to build. Below you will find the last part of the build log (probably the most relevant part, but not necessarily). If required, the full build log is available here: https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202605/ About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages. If you cannot reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is fully reproducible. If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and add an affects on src:notmuch, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [...] debian/rules clean dh clean --with python3,elpa,sphinxdoc debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' dh_auto_clean make -j2 distclean make[2]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' rm -rf util/xutil.o util/error_util.o util/hex-escape.o uti [too-long-redacted] tamp notmuch-*.tar.gz.tmp .deps rm -rf performance-test/corpus performance-test/notmuch.cache.* bindings/python-cffi/_notmuch_config.py bindings/python-cffi/notmuch2.egg-info .first-build-message Makefile.config sh.config sphinx.config make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' dh_auto_clean --sourcedirectory bindings/ruby /usr/bin/make -C contrib/notmuch-mutt clean make[2]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/contrib/notmuch-mutt' rm -f notmuch-mutt.1 README.html make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/contrib/notmuch-mutt' [... snipped ...] cls=cls, object_hook=object_hook, parse_float=parse_float, parse_int=parse_int, parse_constant=parse_constant, object_pairs_hook=object_pairs_hook, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 352, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 345, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 363, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 2 column 1 (char 1) T351-pgpmime-mangling: Testing PGP/MIME message mangling FAIL reply to 'Mixed-Up' mangled PGP/MIME message correctly T355-smime: Testing S/MIME signature verification and decryption FAIL reply to PKCS#7 SignedData message with proper quoting and attribution --- T355-smime.18.expected 2026-05-01 21:11:57.225002585 +0000 +++ T355-smime.18.output 2026-05-01 21:11:57.225002585 +0000 @@ -1 +1,16 @@ +From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> +Subject: Re: The FooCorp contract +To: Alice Lovelace <[email protected]>, Bob Babbage <[email protected]> +In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> +References: <[email protected]> +On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:11:29 -0400, Alice Lovelace <[email protected]> wrote: +> Bob, we need to cancel this contract. +> +> Please start the necessary processes to make that happen today. +> +> Thanks, Alice +> -- +> Alice Lovelace +> President +> OpenPGP Example Corp Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/json_check_nodes.py", line 55, in <module> data = json.load(sys.stdin) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 298, in load return loads(fp.read(), cls=cls, object_hook=object_hook, parse_float=parse_float, parse_int=parse_int, parse_constant=parse_constant, object_pairs_hook=object_pairs_hook, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 352, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 345, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 363, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 2 column 1 (char 1) T356-protected-headers: Testing Message decryption with protected headers FAIL protected subject does not leak by default in replies Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/json_check_nodes.py", line 55, in <module> data = json.load(sys.stdin) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 298, in load return loads(fp.read(), cls=cls, object_hook=object_hook, parse_float=parse_float, parse_int=parse_int, parse_constant=parse_constant, object_pairs_hook=object_pairs_hook, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 352, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 345, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 363, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 2 column 1 (char 1) FAIL indexed protected subject is not visible in reply header Traceback (most recent call last): File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/json_check_nodes.py", line 55, in <module> data = json.load(sys.stdin) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 298, in load return loads(fp.read(), cls=cls, object_hook=object_hook, parse_float=parse_float, parse_int=parse_int, parse_constant=parse_constant, object_pairs_hook=object_pairs_hook, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/__init__.py", line 352, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 345, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/lib/python3.13/json/decoder.py", line 363, in raw_decode raise JSONDecodeError("Expecting value", s, err.value) from None json.decoder.JSONDecodeError: Expecting value: line 2 column 1 (char 1) FAIL when replying, avoid rendering legacy-display part T357-index-decryption: Testing indexing decrypted mail FAIL notmuch reply should show cleartext if session key is present --- T357-index-decryption.34.expected 2026-05-01 21:12:00.773002735 +0000 +++ T357-index-decryption.34.output 2026-05-01 21:12:00.773002735 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -> This is a top sekrit message. + T358-emacs-protected-headers: Testing protected headers in emacs interface FAIL Reply within emacs to a message with protected headers, not leaking subject --- T358-emacs-protected-headers.4.EXPECTED 2026-05-01 21:12:04.361002886 +0000 +++ T358-emacs-protected-headers.4.OUTPUT 2026-05-01 21:12:04.361002886 +0000 @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: [email protected] -Subject: Re: Subject Unavailable -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/tmp.T358-emacs-protected-headers/mail/sent -References: <[email protected]> ---text follows this line-- -<#secure method=pgpmime mode=signencrypt> [email protected] writes: - -> This is the sekrit message *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) FAIL don't leak protected subject during reply, even if indexed --- T358-emacs-protected-headers.8.EXPECTED 2026-05-01 21:12:06.577002980 +0000 +++ T358-emacs-protected-headers.8.OUTPUT 2026-05-01 21:12:06.577002980 +0000 @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: [email protected] -Subject: Re: Subject Unavailable -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/tmp.T358-emacs-protected-headers/mail/sent -References: <[email protected]> ---text follows this line-- -<#secure method=pgpmime mode=signencrypt> [email protected] writes: - -> This is the sekrit message *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) Error: database path '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/tmp.T400-hooks/database.85' does not exist or is not a directory. T453-emacs-reply: Testing emacs reply FAIL tar not inlined by default --- T453-emacs-reply.1.EXPECTED 2026-05-01 21:12:41.265004443 +0000 +++ T453-emacs-reply.1.OUTPUT 2026-05-01 21:12:41.265004443 +0000 @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> -Subject: Re: bug: "no top level messages" crash on Zen email loops -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: MAIL_DIR/sent ---text follows this line-- -Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> writes: - -> And obviously I forget the frigging attachment. -> -> -> PS: don't we have a "you forgot to actually attach the damn file" plugin -> when we detect the word "attachment" and there's no attach? :p *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/T453-emacs-reply.sh: line 31: OUTPUT.raw: No such file or directory FAIL body, duplicate=1 --- T453-emacs-reply.2.expected 2026-05-01 21:12:43.357004531 +0000 +++ T453-emacs-reply.2.output 2026-05-01 21:12:43.357004531 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -> # body 1 + *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) grep: OUTPUT.raw: No such file or directory FAIL body, duplicate=2 --- T453-emacs-reply.3.expected 2026-05-01 21:12:45.397004617 +0000 +++ T453-emacs-reply.3.output 2026-05-01 21:12:45.397004617 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -> # body 2 + *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) grep: OUTPUT.raw: No such file or directory FAIL duplicate=3, subject --- T453-emacs-reply.4.expected 2026-05-01 21:12:47.509004706 +0000 +++ T453-emacs-reply.4.output 2026-05-01 21:12:47.509004706 +0000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Re: Bug#916807: Increase severity to 'serious' + *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) FAIL duplicate=4 Missing or zero length file: OUTPUT *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/T453-emacs-reply.sh: line 68: OUTPUT.raw: No such file or directory T454-emacs-dont-reply-names: Testing message-dont-reply-to-names in emacs replies FAIL regular expression --- T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.1.EXPECTED 2026-05-01 21:12:52.769004928 +0000 +++ T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.1.OUTPUT 2026-05-01 21:12:52.773004928 +0000 @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> -Subject: Re: [notmuch] Working with Maildir storage? -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: MAIL_DIR/sent ---text follows this line-- *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.sh: line 19: OUTPUT-FULL.raw: No such file or directory head: cannot open 'OUTPUT-FULL' for reading: No such file or directory FAIL predicate --- T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.2.EXPECTED-PRED 2026-05-01 21:12:54.805005014 +0000 +++ T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.2.OUTPUT-PRED 2026-05-01 21:12:54.805005014 +0000 @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[email protected]> -Cc: [email protected] -Subject: Re: [notmuch] Working with Maildir storage? -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: MAIL_DIR/sent ---text follows this line-- *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.sh: line 40: OUTPUT-FULL-PRED.raw: No such file or directory head: cannot open 'OUTPUT-FULL-PRED' for reading: No such file or directory FAIL nil value --- T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.3.EXPECTED-NIL 2026-05-01 21:12:56.837005100 +0000 +++ T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.3.OUTPUT-NIL 2026-05-01 21:12:56.837005100 +0000 @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[email protected]>, Mikhail Gusarov <[email protected]> -Cc: [email protected] -Subject: Re: [notmuch] Working with Maildir storage? -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: MAIL_DIR/sent ---text follows this line-- *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/test/T454-emacs-dont-reply-names.sh: line 61: OUTPUT-FULL-NIL.raw: No such file or directory head: cannot open 'OUTPUT-FULL-NIL' for reading: No such file or directory T520-show: Testing "notmuch show" BROKEN quoting in From T570-revision-tracking: Testing database revision tracking BROKEN no warning from uuid as global option T592-thread-breakage: Testing thread breakage during reindexing BROKEN No ghosts should remain after deletion of second message T630-emacs-draft: Testing Emacs Draft Handling FAIL Saving a draft keeps hidden headers --- T630-emacs-draft.6.EXPECTED 2026-05-01 21:13:38.577006860 +0000 +++ T630-emacs-draft.6.OUTPUT.clean 2026-05-01 21:13:38.581006860 +0000 @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> -From: Notmuch Test Suite <[email protected]> -To: Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> -Subject: draft-test-reply -In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> -Fcc: MAIL_DIR/sent ---text follows this line-- -Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> writes: - -> And obviously I forget the frigging attachment. -> -> -> PS: don't we have a "you forgot to actually attach the damn file" plugin -> when we detect the word "attachment" and there's no attach? :p *ERROR*: notmuch exited with status Segmentation fault (see *Notmuch errors* for more details) T670-duplicate-mid: Testing duplicate message ids BROKEN First subject preserved in notmuch-show (json) BROKEN Regexp search for second subject skip all tests in T810-tsan Notmuch test suite complete. 2023/2129 tests passed. 13 broken tests failed as expected. 94 tests failed. -1 tests skipped. All tests in 1 file skipped. ERROR: some tests failed; first failed returned error code 1 make[1]: *** [test/Makefile.local:69: test] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>' dh_auto_test: error: make -j2 test TESTSUITEFLAGS="-j2 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [debian/rules:9: binary] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess failed with exit status 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------=_1785203822-1963521-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 1135526-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2026 01:54:42 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,PGPSIGNATURE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 73; neutral, 23; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*ct:pgp-sha256, 0.000-+--H*ct:application, 0.000-+--H*ct:protocol, 0.000-+--H*ct:micalg, 0.000-+--H*ct:signed Return-path: <[email protected]> Received: from phubs.tethera.net ([192.99.9.157]:60518) by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1woX1l-008EVZ-2Z for [email protected]; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:54:42 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tethera.net; [email protected]; q=dns/txt; s=2024; t=1785203676; h=from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=Mp7RcIkofZWF1vN/6MIacO5+DvL3hy8fWrIvOu9SoHw=; b=Bv9t8wvG3qWY0YsOXE5xvSN1S81OFN8Wkj9DZa+hcXWfSkZKAaHL+LMk3K0VhCAC1cZuV p8bnz0zr+yYCgIwhyK4PrguLci+NMsd60NpoCuIcDKWbF+yI27gQu47G7UNEV6Y4nQsogKL bY1+YFhqDlcwbpyY1zglgzJGC3v9P2WKPXKiVSByVJ25wRSZ+Q66R2Y6vR89Yr2b5SHiz75 yV4Pz38px8UY7rIYnwkTgAyJJV6hygxRjc+VC6MP59Sb/iKZXzHCcdN8tJnAaX/2F8MmyWU RYTcFgpaLnI//ZVJ4CTXEDhIpG91DxAMQip8NltfIbQN1U1gyXP37zDG2jIQ== Received: from tethera.net (fctnnbsc38w-142-162-23-52.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net [142.162.23.52]) by phubs.tethera.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E6F1800F7 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:54:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: (nullmailer pid 425843 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:54:36 -0000 From: David Bremner <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Bug#1135526: Possible miscompilation at -O2 In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 22:54:28 -0300 Message-ID: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain If I read the changelog(s) correctly, then this was fixed with upstream PR125252, fixed in GCC 15.3 and later in 16.2. Thanks to Sam James and Martin Uecker in particular for getting this fixed upstream. d --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIgEARYIADAWIQS5beC2erx2PFqyC7XhcL+0NDTnAAUCamgL1BIcZGF2aWRAdGV0 aGVyYS5uZXQACgkQ4XC/tDQ05wB6CQEA23gDyg8MVVRHucI+6jdzH2xRFvDIaV86 yibuTk45H+oA/Au4uRN/A2zDlkBqNZE4EUMDt+ZjiUkGHT5l0zHC49IN =b2Zk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1785203822-1963521-0--