Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
"Jonathan Dowland" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon Apr 27, 2026 at 2:09 PM BST, c.buhtz wrote: > Why not using popcon data. To my information the install images are > based on that data. The "most used" packages are on the first image. > Do we still have Debian on multiple DVD images? ;) Why not listing all > licenses from the first (and maybe second) image? That might be by > definition the "most important" packages. What list of changes do those suggestion generate? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE4DfLKhoAYblDNjyLCQdAlgaqqqoFAmnvbe8ACgkQCQdAlgaq qqpGUhAAlnuB/12luQEzDIQGReX+l/M7gy+8EIZDtlMBq3CFYMeT+L/tnhlIxS0M p34h8S4oIyZlXdlw3HdKUyyipHEbI+JqTZtyC4d0IYH7rBxbW87gtu4qRDb+drL9 HYkhXm1qyCcCDS+iF9xWZseMlbECPWVwJEE79yoL5ys3XvU5doC1+u6CUCUbiokI syO1foRMt1+exoRg6s8xcduCabmKKXc+j1hHMrhKLHFavZv2hrxpeqaCIcy5xcVI gcswcdsT+h5iiKAqAmLgTeZI8tjomBx4jDmbFygnfRowHItUAi17oxrh39stlvVd U3JbU0nAxp7MkfwkBTuWth2n7NVj7mu2gIjdaYZNRje+SpHT5ADmvdX9H0I2WkyI xZ+QYUvvhmKciTcCQ35HDYHE11deQjQTYzOPAv3JiIAj8E6OPxcPQtL4fQRX6uJA H9xll6WtEn2g30lv4xnDVMP7HMYl4Qs2mPt/a37cJ+nMzeWh+W6+QfSp04ICmwF1 8RGh1WPJeqGOHcJFSZ7BFZmFie5omp+UAcuhwb6/0WotKbZhfHhPY1fOstv+/anX eEADKNPiZQLQBAvP02QgbgLXBakFeu+0QDYO/43LYgnqDxnceT5jK8/MgLkI/hHj 5ouOAoBhgGbPIwzGLNGc2HwyqCALCczXr/+N4m7K1owOQIvP7to= =WeDQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----