Re: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?

Bill Allombert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <ae-TU2UlpYZkiVQY@seventeen>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:02:01AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> Hello
> 
> As a member of the new DFSG team, I would like to restart the discussion
> from September 2023..
> 
> The issue at hand is the inclusion of additional license texts in the
> base-files package.
> 
> In doing so, I would like to continue Russ Albery’s proposal [0].
> 
> Licenses will be included in common-licenses if they meet all of the
> following criteria:
> 
>     * The license is DFSG-free.

Do you mean the license text or the license itself ?

>     * Exactly the same license wording is used by all works covered by it.
>     * The license applies to at least 100 source packages in Debian.
>     * The license text is longer than 25 lines.

For the remaining licenses, I have made a proposal to fill in debian/copyright
at build time from the list of SPDX identifier.
This is still an option if the NEW team does not reject it.

Cheers,
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.