Re: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:20:16AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > I think that the "at least 100 packages" part of this proposal is too > low a bar. why do you think so? I think 100 is quite a high bar already. (assuming we talk source packages.) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ 2006: "Data is the new oil" 2026: "AI is the new microplastics"
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmnwhzgACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhyTNRAArWnPy/szZX8P6ZckoBVYz+vGRpXtRLZc0dKBO2PtuO5PK2diafql+2L9 zaIZ5BoCTb0VnS4wUs4YLZagr/4LulHChN/HdXiwBewqi/gggSevMqPOeKKBFNVU ZiRviMxfjCrFqZe1n2AomavATMru90yZALfGRsAcDY2B+sc4Zl/1M2kFOlkzoQ6n QhGcJFaiwfBA+4unWWEAWXRQ61Ij/7kQ0if7PEhEqAQ3hUdWNZcRYkqqpq5GRzdW ALE9ZME+2NUUI0drmi7c77xaXEKFcy8zeSANwoLwM3NkuxJpHrZRoc/iY8TWRF/q Q3IE4pqOMoO35GNkL7ulv3wu6cLPozKNjMnE9ViCFzNGfbjbiUeo3X5HNquw9Y8J bjsC9ynuGChhK6rmgXrUyzb/VgW4uoT+WSs5L3WHZr9vVJ/KJILv60CzZq7eOSKG XCg0BZktZ1+vkOgJe2qGNVJD1jZZTl6tFufWgHynilTTPohMpUixWp7Ws8eL8O1l FWRjuNLiEDpTssnHmlmIBSQcj6v0hfdXaDaxP/rqVRl3oURtIG6N3GOkA3WTlKn4 Em5vyYyHC2HVgZnTVxI2B1ZsBTKra91t8/thDduO2uI3ANFAHahVCgDR7AYIhqTt R2bMZo6UXoAK3Fz50K/Xsu4T2Vc6WfVhiWHjVtryXvb+26QJlSk= =hffv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----