Re: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 09:29:56AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: [..] > Folks who actively work on embedded Debian should of course feel free to > correct me, but my recollection of past discussions is that they had > roughly the same position. > > I think even in the worst case scenario of a system with a ton of Debian > chroots, the incremental size here is highly unlikely to be a significant > factor compared to, e.g., normal growth in the size of the utilities in > the base image. > And of course the local system administrator can always > rm -r /usr/share/common-licenses if they really want to. > (I doubt anything > important uses files there at runtime.) It might be sensible to have policy allow for this, and thus require that no packages *use* these files during their normal operation (and also not in maintscripts, etc). Except maybe for tools explicitly designed to operate on them (say, license checkers, devscripts). I hope there is pre-established wording in policy that could be reused for such an exception. Chris