Re: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Charles Plessy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Le Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 06:38:30PM +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit : > >I agree. SPDX didn't exist at the time that copyright-format was first >designed, but now it does, and it has convenient names for a lot of >licenses. To be more precise, it was already existing when we finished DEP5, but one of the reasons we did not align with it is that it lacked a syntax for describing license exceptions. It got one since then, see https://spdx.org/licenses/exceptions-index.html. I am all for aligning more strongly with SPDX now. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/09/msg00163.html Have a nice day, Charles