Re: MBF proposal: pidof used without Depends: procps

On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 10:38:49PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
>On 07/05/26 18:07, Colin Watson wrote:
>>Could you please exclude all the udebs from this MBF?  Those are 
>>false positives, as in d-i pidof is provided by busybox-udeb and is 
>>guaranteed to be available without needing a dependency.
>
>Thanks Colin! I removed finish-install, netcfg, open-iscsi and rootskel.

I don't think it was correct to exclude open-iscsi on this basis.  The 
udeb is open-iscsi-udeb instead; and a call to pidof is also present in 
the deb.

Thanks,