Re: MBF proposal: pidof used without Depends: procps

Gioele Barabucci <[email protected]> writes:



> The aim of this MBF is to add procps to the dependencies of 94 package
> that make use of `pidof` at runtime. (The use of pidof in
> initscritpts, build-time tests, and autopkgstests will be addressed
> separately. See #810018 for more information.)
>

maybe include something like the sentence in brackets in the template,
as packages using pidof are presumably somewhat likely to also use it in
tests and other places, and some peple might want to address those uses
as well, rtaher than having to do another upload in future