Re: PoDoFo 1.1 released and relicensed to LGPL2+ or MPL 2.0

Salvo Tomaselli <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <CAOOnQAeG8YpHNm7HOEqnVLRHxWB6RA30u96BNx7efhf+OCd-rA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

would you consider packaging the new version yourself and requesting a
sponsor to upload it?

Best

Il giorno sab 9 mag 2026 alle ore 12:18 Francesco Pretto
<[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
> Hello debian-devel,
>
> This is my first post in this mailing list. I'm the maintainer of the
> upstream PoDoFo library[1], and I'm here to discuss the situation of
> the podofo library in Debian. The libpodofo package[2]  in Debian hasn't
> seen a major update since May 2022. Since then, three major upstream
> updates have been released: 0.10 in 2023, 1.0 in 2025 and 1.1 in 2026.
> 0.10.x and 1.0.x received updates until May 1st 2026 and are now
> deprecated, with 1.1.x selected as the new LTS series.
>
> We were in contact with the Debian/Ubuntu maintainer for a period and
> I hoped a newer release of PoDoFo in Debian was just a matter of time.
> Unfortunately, this hasn't happened. Because of the enduring
> situation, I want to make a clear statement about the status about the
> version of the PoDoFo distributed now in Debian:
>
> -  The 0.9.x series has not received an update since 0.9.8 and has
> been effectively deprecated. No previous upstream maintainer stepped
> in to support it so it's also unmaintained;
> - The PoDoFo tools have been indefinitely declared[3] unsupported and
> unmaintained.
>
> I leave the decision on how to proceed to the Debian developers. If a
> new Debian maintainer steps in to create 1.1 packages, I'd like to add
> a couple of notes to help with the integration:
>
> - As stated the new license is  LGPL2+ or MPL 2.0 for the source code.
> However, with the default enabled "Adobe Font Development Kit for
> OpenType" integration (Apache2 licensed) the library is not compatible
> with GPL2-only software as a whole. The integration allows for Type1
> font subsetting so I generally don't recommend disabling it;
> - I'm establishing a "no package patches" policy in PoDoFo, meaning
> that all reasonable features needed by packagers should be available
> by default in PoDoFo upstream. If you need a feature/fix, just ask for it;
> - The deprecated PoDoFo tools still compile, but are opt-in enabled.
> At some point they may be reinstated, but not in the short term.
>
> Feel free to ask if you need any further information.
>
> Best,
> Francesco
>
> [1] https://github.com/podofo/podofo
> [2] https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/libpodofo
> [3] https://github.com/podofo/podofo#podofo-tools
>


-- 
Salvo Tomaselli

I difensori della morale tradizionale sono raramente persone di cuore. Si è
tentati di pensare che essi si servano della morale come di legittimo sfogo
al loro desiderio di fare del male agli altri.
               -- Bertrand Russell, Perché non sono cristiano. 1957

http://ltworf.github.io/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.