Re: PoDoFo 1.1 released and relicensed to LGPL2+ or MPL 2.0
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <177836523295.5412.16481270719216523609@localhost> |
Hi all, Quoting Francesco Pretto (2026-05-09 12:18:59) > - I'm establishing a "no package patches" policy in PoDoFo, meaning > that all reasonable features needed by packagers should be available > by default in PoDoFo upstream. If you need a feature/fix, just ask for it; I contacted Francesco privately about this point and they asked me to summarize our conversation. In short, what they meant was not to be understood as a condition for packaging PoDoFo but was instead meant as an invitation to packagers to send their patches upstream so that they can be quickly included. Since there are a few upstreams around who would like to put conditions on Debian packaging their software, I feared that this was a similar situation and asked Francesco to clarify. I was happy to hear that it was just a misunderstanding and Francesco just wants to motivate packagers to keep their patch stack small. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEElFhU6KL81LF4wVq58sulx4+9g+EFAmn/sywACgkQ8sulx4+9 g+GRmhAAtm0soxy0MNl/b7clN/KWvb7q7IA7FwvCAy1WxcdoY+kz8NR7oZWNxBgh Dp7wBawv7cu1ISdan8dTmJ8j1j6LfygU1u09TweJ+CXH36Ub/laxZLerTIncuwuc +0afLXN48rgPjpvkWfeeU2DLC1tzrhhCytsTh7+GrUMKzm0pZkqw6vtJFNfY0W/R auKbO11+FjZtH4hWGCKCpHBmLTaDtv2etzF8mKMb1Bhg5Z2w1rV02aqu2nnp0N4C KTX+oqSLus4/mTq3DTIVtEJjvNSgeJlWROcl7R2gRRUceRRyhMDJyLJF7LsQnTK4 CNzrt78JXUhrYMKuWZkIcfBPbEGoRhqywtnVXl3VBsNYq85fGrvo2mQWKzVUvI6s H0nOr0jJBf89+9MQ1FSTLObisGbbkFfPNbMMCS0dt7sdOfKOn3T5NfBG4h6ZvLkk D76v+O0l6fbRwN27TNGAxqDw/lFJWLPmnjW/Xjic/4kX8+FIY5VNGklRHJCf2kA3 IwHkZwVFMVp5QpoP+rBB4jJBFBC9rGYBPtZ0Ho8H8/aGgMk1iMyqJ3y280hkSMEp EYDxuVUx0lwq4lQRQamlTtjyQx+NyKD8UwEdnIKgNExYVKAedFeirpVsMWbKlTLa MY0XJOvERDMkS3hX01DwptlswLekT6IaatwwUWMGeDbppFNeVUg= =xPbF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----