Re: Maintainer: Debian Commons

Hi,

On 5/12/26 10:22, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I would still prefer some static e-mail address.  It makes things easier
> for generators of debian/control and parsers for statistical purposes.
> What do you think?  Would some magic static e-mail address be better?
> Which one?


For reasons that Simon McVittie explained much better than I could, I 
explicitly didn't create an e-mail list (I wouldn't subscribe) and also 
didn't create the tracker team as Timo did (I won't subscribe). I 
thought about it and I discarded it.

While being able to see which packages are in this group is nice, that 
wasn't a goal I had. What I wanted to express is that if you have any 
issues with one of my packages, just go and fix them, no need to ask. 
You don't need to find them in some overview for that purpose. If this 
movement becomes a thing, we'll fix our tools to show it.

Paul

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=gdJT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----