Re: Licensing of licenses

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello togehter,

I am the upstream author of "spdx2debian" and beside of that not 
involved in Debian Maintaining.

The resue-tool itself "ignores" license files when validating the 
SPDX-compliance of a project.
As some of you pointed out it is tricky to add a license to a license 
file. So why not exclude license files from lintian (and other similiar 
tools) and modify the Debian policy accordingly.
Adding a license to a license feels like a workaround to me.

On the other hand, "reuse-tool" does not recognize "d/copyright" as a 
license file, so it warns if there is no license for that file. 
Therefore, "spdx2debian" currently generates a license file for it using 
"CC0-1.0" as license and "None" as copyright holder. It is also a 
workaround.

Regards,
Christian Buhtz
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.