Re: Licensing of licenses
Mechtilde Stehmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Am 17.05.26 um 15:33 schrieb [email protected]: > So what? I have to force the DM to add a license info by itself somehow? Who do you have to force. Who do you mean with DM? Who forces you to do so? > On a first run, without having a d/copyright, spdx2debian will work fine. > On a second run, it discovers that the d/copyright has no license, and > it will fail. Do you want to list the (non-free) licenses and the authors of the license texts themselves? In my opinion it is a misunderstanding to require an explicit license statement for the debian/copyright file. Regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE8ON/Pch6SZgomTnn8od7uhQarX8FAmoJ1aMACgkQ8od7uhQa rX/3WxAAtVqwrZoMcxx1UOGnXRg3vvOi0Yzz1GcrhoexJiL8q4pnqpz6V9gm3vg8 g7WpNasqv8XOPHaz5MrupXWZ9/ejFNaTqSqfYrJYyCRQAKgd64NZf5id5AI1FGlX ZSpB4hgyL7JN59wBk6lvPaVEmQCR6a9nxahAT6nq2OUaSPKs/3ngVmYn2CWzLkE1 mXJ4Y3YFoUkXglrxwyl9VodVsr2Go9FGqsvj38TBe/SdBOCnsImWzuqvyq16Z85k qM0w4MSda1BPf8IDeLNpjQlfikSRkCmW17rScgxxQ8uaeLK1q4cVx1f+YXkgRh57 kYTfTWjPu77RxI/wz3KNo5cCO1It1mejm7XkKtcX5LytMdzGnxyWfiFg6Gj+ugcC jcGfNBOCegZ/5NoJZyhrN1fOcVuvePP8MI0nPr6CBWDqe9bEXgw6z4Y6EbMXPjC3 H/JURUvJCAKZ8w7SVuXoT5kVoBmmH4t4hdWdn6wNsaLIccLO8ztgHXBKHgaZVcR2 GFSitHOBjttozYn4QRGghSiZmNEjieI5hPFqsha+kzpiW5wJfKZt9UkJUtQ31qKS 2hTk7fFaqr+KLCqeslAyHWrUjkT+n+pPAj6WqoErHXO35vF9Z4jiG7X5PbhdaE/Q V7ikBz4LzOIGA6m1LcKAG6OtdYTvAqEnrEwPU+TuQH0C6QDTIdg= =FW17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----