Re: bits from the release team

Peter Blackman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 18/05/2026 14:26, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> * Peter Blackman <[email protected]> [2026-05-18 14:17]:
>>> We're about half-way the forky release cycle and we'd like to update you on a
>>> small step in code, but a giant leap in commitment.
>>>
>>> Reproducibility
>>> ===============
>>>
>>> Aided by the efforts of the Reproducible Builds project [1], we've decided it's
>>> time to say that Debian must ship reproducible packages. Since yesterday, we
>>> have enabled our migration software to block migration of new packages that
>>> can't be reproduced [2] or existing packages (in testing) that regress in
>>> reproducibility.
>>
>> do you literally mean just "new" packages,
>> (i.e. packages that are not currently in the archive),
>>
>> or does this also include packages deemed NEW because
>> they have the upstream version number in the package name
>> (shared libraries, build tools etc.)?
> 
> New as in packages not in the testing distribution.
> 
> Cheers Jochen

Hi,

This doesn’t really answer my intended question.

Suppose packagefoo7 is in the testing distribution.
That is packagefoo (upstream version 7)

packagefoo8 is then uploaded, a new upstream version of packagefoo.

What happens? (assuming both are unreproducible)


Cheers,
Peter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.