Re: bits from the release team
Peter Blackman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/05/2026 14:26, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Blackman <[email protected]> [2026-05-18 14:17]: >>> We're about half-way the forky release cycle and we'd like to update you on a >>> small step in code, but a giant leap in commitment. >>> >>> Reproducibility >>> =============== >>> >>> Aided by the efforts of the Reproducible Builds project [1], we've decided it's >>> time to say that Debian must ship reproducible packages. Since yesterday, we >>> have enabled our migration software to block migration of new packages that >>> can't be reproduced [2] or existing packages (in testing) that regress in >>> reproducibility. >> >> do you literally mean just "new" packages, >> (i.e. packages that are not currently in the archive), >> >> or does this also include packages deemed NEW because >> they have the upstream version number in the package name >> (shared libraries, build tools etc.)? > > New as in packages not in the testing distribution. > > Cheers Jochen Hi, This doesn’t really answer my intended question. Suppose packagefoo7 is in the testing distribution. That is packagefoo (upstream version 7) packagefoo8 is then uploaded, a new upstream version of packagefoo. What happens? (assuming both are unreproducible) Cheers, Peter