Re: Proposing the retirement of default-mysql-* metapackages for Forky

Thomas Goirand <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/16/26 6:10 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I want to start a discussion about dismantling the
> default-mysql-server and default-mysql-client virtual packages for
> Forky (Debian 14), and transitioning the archive to point explicitly
> to mariadb-server and mariadb-client.
> 
> To be clear: this change is proposed strictly for Forky and won't
> affect any older or currently supported stable releases.
> 
> With the recent releases of MySQL 9.7 and MariaDB 12.3, there is now
> enough divergence between the two codebases to warrant dismantling
> this metapackage. Their SQL dialects, authentication methods and other
> features have drifted to the point where treating them as
> interchangeable drop-in alternatives under a single virtual package is
> becoming misleading. We have already seen this friction for example in
> the Perl ecosystem had to split into libdbd-mysql-perl and
> libdbd-mariadb-perl because the underlying drivers can no longer
> support both engines.
> 
> It is also evident that the broader open source ecosystem has shifted
> from MySQL to MariaDB in the past decade as newer MySQL versions are
> not getting traction. For example, according to WordPress.org usage
> statistics[1], MySQL 8.4 has only managed a 7% share two years after
> its April 2024 release, while the more recent MariaDB 11.8 already has
> a 13% share - nearly double the traction in half the time. Those stats
> also show MariaDB's overall share is now over 60%. Also note that for
> MySQL, the majority is still on versions 5.7 or 8.0, which both are
> now EOL and their share is likely to drop soon.
> 
> Many prominent open source projects also recommend MariaDB over MySQL
> (e.g. Nextcloud [2],Mediawiki [3]). Despite pledges from the
> community, Oracle hasn't shown any signs of being a better open source
> steward, the commit activity is decreasing [4], and no new commits
> have been published for the main branch in the past 5 months.
> 
> If you look at the Debian Popcon graph for mysql-server versions [5],
> it shows that users installing MySQL in derivatives or from
> third-party repos are becoming increasingly rare. When comparing
> directly MySQL vs MariaDB in popcon it is also very obvious that
> interest for MySQL is vaining rapidly [6].
> 
> By announcing this abstraction as deprecated now, we give maintainers
> plenty of time to update their Depends and Build-Depends to point
> explicitly to MariaDB. The whole metapackage can be removed once zero
> packages depend on it in Forky+1 or +2. Users who require Oracle MySQL
> can continue to use third-party repositories, but our archive
> packaging should honestly reflect what Debian actually ships and
> supports in main.
> 
> Let me know if you see any concrete blockers for your packages.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Otto

Can you confirm that no application will be compatible with one or the 
other? Like, will my applications stop working with mysql, somehow?

If not, I don't see the point.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.