Re: Re: bits from the release team
Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Debian Project |
| Message-ID | <ah0YPKPp_4dfr5ns@mpd> |
Hi Steven, * Steven Robbins <[email protected]> [2026-05-31 18:03]: >The qa page shows TWO things under the Rep column. Sometimes both are >checkmarks, sometimes they say different things. Do we need to pay attention >to BOTH statuses? If not, which one? The first one is tests.r-b.o, the second one reproduce.d.n. For testing migration (britney) only the second one is relevant. >Also - sometimes the tests.reproducible-builds.org status reports FTBFS while >reproduce.debian.net has a checkmark and the regular debian build machines >appear OK. What's different in the reproducible-builds setup? tests.r-b.o does build time variation, uses pbuilder instead of sbuild and other things. Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc7KZy9TurdzAF+h6W//cwljmlDMFAmodGDkACgkQW//cwljm lDOQNQ//cnrk1Ck1biBAt5NKhJH7uWbrqLme1VqZ5kSARd3RBxhDr+ZLTLnrQagK uZfSzqWiT0vo+6t4+D5kzNew/cA5aFUaOQBaegAqoPG0fMwpqtB2GBW3DmzLIccH m1NznM/yH2tWdl61R16XOsf4+Ix3n13JkmyYLVpqONIPGFb7lH8xFEh46egnpIVK o013YuDuUe05WDkC7+Xg8mmqAszKuz+dq0fS67RCP05R1GBld4Ivjf33GQozplTV VcvyVUybdJovmq4nfFy58loiHCl1xf64ztxLXj7spuK6jzpntgS1vQXP9Y4INHwu oZyRXXVszQNQ32jd8avGm8m2iadBZrkqlrwb3PQIK0HKakxGWLRZ4/MxW7mr08R+ 8VRUhq9GP7ELe4bCSzqiFKgqIuS6ChO2bpw2Vc8n/xUsZsVx93JWfOCyHWCvhBrJ M8q/VlXJIH19b+v3qndDgqcoIN8EFwsxK+VWVMDXlqJOkp5UGHhb4tbAqmJluoZL 0fk2dydyNfmwdPFLxKkoReePbrn7CuWB4kDCOhFuYtxOeXzVkJCGAbvf15njQ2N1 VfNpKhYSPvCih1VcRVnM9UuhvWuF8yQvXOUS039vjEtATcdFSoB68qYFsfiZBN3R u91gg5KZOu6Pcs/wRkWvMa4Djtl7AjH/4oz+FjQRljJWXZcACSQ= =RUmo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----