Re: Maintaining potentially orphaned packages in Debian Commons team
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Aurélien COUDERC (2026-06-05 15:25:48) > > Le 5 juin 2026 14:30:35 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >I'd like to propose some procedure for packages that appear to lack > > >active maintenance, but where no formal orphaning has taken place. > > > > how would that be different from the existing package salvaging procedure already documented at [1][2] ? > > As I understand it, salvaging is a process to adopt a package, whereas > this seems to be an interest in revoking a maintainer *without* > adoption. ...so orphaning + a QA upload... G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEELuenpRf8EkzxFcNUZR7vsCUn3xMFAmoi1vkACgkQZR7vsCUn 3xPZRhAAiWNj+G6+wFz+atjzupmF/091Ffi6guYDCN7qSJkMoc165eP/gypowvVy c0VZjTGl/TAgEI/x6Y7K6YTJVKyCNEldzFHI8JdmZX/h2GmpMSVMZOtvBDW6ZzuR zFPwG8xNDE8JamQ/8iG9BfcIUBtjqsPlusO8M0ajo/3rczEibn+VsJb+b1RIS8VV 1RLyi87dN6qieUGK4HnWFEbk8Tt2z+E0H3AQqk5BxwcLbQyMgRiOO1EAwdKMEVEG jVFcSrixSwNHIDjPPiW8kCA5IJMZkPIMg5NxEylaVb3hvllPB0uf1iNBvG8l+iJy 28VjeHeJUPnEoRAd0HpkpQB02lv6n8VdYKuQ+QeQaM8O27q6kFS6daFDtUCAGwIT HYaNQERQdga9y/7rp5bHACuiRK6tobmj1xa+MxZ633xcFjsMK4+3UazvKcByyalP t+ggG3WKj5L1X/EsDgaMRFA61CMz3ARrNA47Ti6PfXMAH1VCFq8oIKtzs220ljsv 4tC6f17ALIkapnD0Y/H/1njQhkw09zQLQlZJUDX7iEbSuxZ8E1FHtDSoblBGR99L 30QOUNkMweYIbcswa+ZcOJnDUDZtoGx1G0plXVtE5J0MJ2ShPy7hx1m6V7Xylu7Q UDpzRkd5DP3W59RP7foyQsdoEMCKNjdv42WHK2t8yRUfaVn6Qrw= =RQDv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----